top of page

Research Library

​

Source records.

Find regulatory pages, government records, supporting research, and the project’s own published statements. Our goal is to make claims verifiable and differences between versions visible.

 

County approval and project history

Local application materials, studies, and permitting history provide a record to compare against later project revisions.

 

Fluvanna County’s Expedition project record

 

Air quality and health

Read the independent PM2.5 analysis and supporting materials. Model estimates depend on assumptions and should not be presented as direct measurements of future illness.

 

Air and health report folder

State review and participation

Use SCC case number PUR-2026-00102 when reviewing Expedition Generating I, LLC and Expedition Generating II, LLC or submitting comments.

​

Official SCC comment portal
Official public-witness information

Company representations

Tenaska’s published statements describe its current proposal. Attribute these claims to the company and compare them with permit filings and agency decisions.

​

Tenaska Expedition FAQ

​

Sources and Reference Materials

[1] Virginia Administrative Code 9VAC5-80-1715 — Source impact analysis

[2] Virginia Administrative Code 9VAC5-80-1735 — Air quality analysis

[3] Virginia Code § 10.1-1186.2:1 — Generating-facility cumulative-impact authority

[4] Secondary PM2.5 formation — Trinity Class I protocol, § 3.8. Document link pending verification.

[5] WHO Global Air Quality Guidelines (2021), Table 3.26

[6] 40 CFR § 50.20 — Primary PM2.5 ambient standards

[7] EPA Integrated Science Assessment for Particulate Matter (2019; 2022 supplement)

[8] Di et al. (2017), Air Pollution and Mortality in the Medicare Population, NEJM

[9] Health Effects Institute, MAPLE Phase 2 (2022), Research Report 212

[10] EPA — Human Health and Environmental Impacts of the Electric Power Sector

[11] Penn et al. (2017) — Electricity-generation pollution and health burden, EHP

[12] 9VAC5-80-1615 — Definition of secondary emissions under PSD review

[13] Public Service Commission of Wisconsin — Environmental Impacts of Power Plants (PDF)

A guide to potential effects on air, water, noise, land use, wildlife, historic sites, traffic and neighborhoods, including supporting transmission lines and pipelines. General educational guidance; Wisconsin’s permitting requirements do not govern Virginia projects.

bottom of page